Oh and for the record I haven't heard anything about this on the news or otherwise... So yup... 

 The State Run media is busy scrubbing all info about this.  Imagine when the new 1,000 "Cyber Security" Experts Obama wants are in place.  The Internet will be squeeky clean of all tidbits which document the communists like Van Jones, the tax cheats like Timmy Geitner, and all the other seedy characters involved with the whitehouse.  Not to mention where he was born.

what will happen to him now?  honestly?

I guess you could call me a "Birther". I have believed since before the election that there was a concerted effort to put him in office in an attempt to discredit our Constitution. There are many guilty parties here, including members of congress and the supreme court.

I hate to throw cold water on all of this, but Obama is a citizen of the United States.  It really doesn't matter where he was born, as long a one of his parents meet the following requirements;

For persons born between December 24, 1952 and November 14, 1986, a person is a U.S. citizen if all of the following are true;

 1.  One of the person's parents was a U.S. citizen when the person in question was born;

2.  The citizen parent lived at least 10 years in the United States before his or her child's birth;

3.  A minimum of 5 of these 10 years in the United States were after the citizen parent's 14th birthday.

Frankly, I don't like Obama any more than anyone else does, and I'd love to see him out of office.  But unless someone can show his mother doesn't meet the above requirements, and as far as I know, she does, he is an American citizen.  It matters not one bit where he was born.  Notice none of the above requirements includes being born within the United States.

@DailyConstruct - First. Obama is a "natural born" citizen.  He is not a foreign national who emigrated here.  There is nothing in that clause you quoted which requires for someone to be a citizen, for them to actually have been born within the United States.

Are you actually trying to say, for example, an American couple on vacation in France who had a child while there would essentially have given birth to a French citizen, not an American one.  I think even you would recognize the absurdity of the statement.

Are you actually trying to convince me that a country which considers a child an American citizen, even if both parents are foreign born as long as the mother gives birth here is going to deprive a child of an American citizen of citizenship just because the woman gives birth overseas.

Based on the Law, Obama's mother met all the requirements for him to be an American citizen, and it matters not one bit what nationality his father is or where he was born.  In fact, he also fulfills the requirements of that clause of the Constitution.  He's is a natural born American citizen and he has resided in the United States for over 14 years.

For your information, the State Department website states as follows:

A child born abroad to one U.S. citizen parent and one alien parent
acquires U.S. citizenship at birth under Section 301(g) INA provided
the citizen parent was physically present in the U.S. for the time
period required by the law applicable at the time of the child's birth.
(For birth on or after November 14, 1986, a period of five years
physical presence, two after the age of fourteen is required. For birth
between December 24, 1952 and November 13, 1986, a period of ten years, five after the age of fourteen are required for physical presence in the U.S. to transmit U.S. citizenship to the child.

Again, Obama's mother meets the requirements for citizenship to be conferred on Obama at birth.  Therefore, he is a "natural born citizen" regardless of where he was born.  Nothing in the above requirements violates anything in the Constitution quote you gave.

I don't like Obama.  I wish he had not been elected.  But I'm not deranged by my dislike to try to make up some reason, based on some misinterpretation of the Constitution, that his election is illegal.  Alan Keyes was wrong in his assertion, which doesn't surprise me being he is neither a lawyer nor a Constitutional scholar, that Obama is not a natural born citizen.  Look up the laws determining who is entitleld to citizenship and you can see that for yourself.

i'm going to repost this. Why did you not tell me your blog was so relevant to my own interests? Sub'd and rec'd. Maybe I won't miss anymore of the good stuff 

"No person except a natural born Citizen, or
a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this
Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither
shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained
to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident
within the United States."
Notice the use of the word "or" in the first part of the clause. If to be President, one had to be both a natural born citizen and a citizen at the time of appointment, why did they use "or" and not "and"?
Just curious. Maybe it's a play on words. Is there any other document that would support the idea that the forefathers at the time of the signing of the Constitution would have agreed that they had to be both and not one or the other?

@DailyConstruct - So, there was no document later on that specifically stated the President had to be natural born? I see that Obama isn't a natural born citizen, if he was born in Kenya as his mom was the only US citizen. And I even understand that clause pertaining the selection by the forefathers, but if no law or amendment was made afterward that stated one had to be a natural born citizen, regardless of citizenship, then I believe Obama is in his right to be President. As we know, the only thing that could change this would be an amendment that changed the "or" to "and".  

@DailyConstruct - In conclusion, I find that there are only two possibilities. The first is that he was born in Hawaii. In his autobiography, which I admit could be skewed, he states that his father went back to Kenya without his mother. In this statement, Obama was most likely born in the states. I've not completely read the book, but I know that his father returned to Kenya alone as there was no money to move everyone to Harvard, like he wanted.
Now, the second possibility could be that his mom did go to Kenya with his father and gave birth to him there. If that is so, then Obama would not be a legal citizen as per the immigration law of as per the last link you gave me. If that's so we would need to see proof that he attained citizenship correctly.
Even then, the Constitution clearly states an "or" clause, meaning he would have to be a natural born citizen or a citizen for 14 years. And I believe I'm correct in thinking that it takes a Constitutional amendment to change to that as no standard law can conflict or over-ride the Constitution.
In effect, we would need to see proof that he is legally a citizen.

@ShamelesslyRed@xanga - lol. now you know.  you're welcome to visit and stay anytime.

After re-reading your post with the links included, I'm almost giddy and high to blog about this. Seriously! haha, I can't even manage to squelch the enthusiasm in the slightest